SEBI vs Jane Street: How a Global Giant Manipulated Indian Markets to Make Crores – What It Means for You
In a monumental and highly anticipated move, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has launched an unprecedented crackdown on global high-frequency trading giant Jane Street, banning the US-based firm and its affiliates from the Indian securities market and demanding a staggering disgorgement of ₹4,843.57 crore in alleged unlawful gains. This decisive action, stemming from a rigorous 15-month investigation, tears back the curtain on sophisticated algorithmic strategies that SEBI claims were designed not for legitimate price discovery, but for systematic market manipulation, primarily exploiting the booming derivatives segment.
The interim order, a 105-page indictment, paints a grim picture of how Jane Street allegedly leveraged its formidable capital and technological prowess to distort market signals, particularly on crucial options expiry days. For too long, the Indian market has observed abnormal volatility around these periods, often leaving retail investors bewildered and facing significant losses. SEBI’s findings now suggest a calculated scheme by Jane Street to engineer these movements for their colossal benefit.
The Core Charge: Why SEBI Lowered the Boom on Jane Street
The absolute main reason behind SEBI’s severe action against Jane Street is the regulator’s firm conclusion that the firm engaged in fraudulent and unfair trade practices (PFUTP regulations). SEBI asserts that Jane Street deliberately and systematically manipulated benchmark indices, specifically the Bank Nifty and Nifty 50, on expiry days. This manipulation created a misleading appearance of genuine market activity, inducing other market participants, especially vulnerable retail investors, to trade on false signals. The ultimate goal for Jane Street, according to SEBI, was to profit immensely from pre-positioned options contracts that benefited from these engineered price distortions.
SEBI’s meticulous investigation, which examined Jane Street‘s trading patterns across 18 key expiry days between January 2023 and March 2025, has unveiled two primary manipulative strategies. The findings reveal a disturbing pattern of cross-segment exploitation, where Jane Street‘s entities incurred calculated losses in cash equities and futures to generate disproportionate, and allegedly illicit, profits in the options market.
The “Intraday Index Manipulation Strategy”: A Deceptive Pump and Dump
This intricate strategy, predominantly observed on Bank Nifty weekly expiry days, showcases the firm’s alleged intent to orchestrate artificial index movements:
Morning Artifice (Artificial Price Inflation): In the early trading hours, its entities would execute aggressive, high-volume purchases of constituent stocks and futures of the Bank Nifty index. These concentrated buying activities would artificially push up or sustain the index’s level, creating a misleading impression of robust demand and bullish momentum. For instance, on January 17, 2024, the firm allegedly made net purchases amounting to a staggering ₹4,370.03 crore in Bank Nifty constituents across cash and futures markets. This substantial buying power created a false sense of an upward trend.
Afternoon Reversal (Engineered Price Crash): Simultaneously with their morning bullish activities, the entity would accumulate substantial bearish positions in Bank Nifty options (e.g., selling call options or buying put options), betting on an eventual decline in the index. Later in the day, especially as expiry approached, the firm would aggressively unwind its morning purchases of cash equities and futures. This sudden, large-scale selling would exert immense downward pressure, causing the Bank Nifty index to plummet sharply.
Massive Profit Realization: As the index crashed due to their engineered selling, the pre-established bearish options positions of the group would experience a dramatic increase in value, leading to colossal profits. SEBI’s analysis revealed that on January 17, 2024, this singular strategy resulted in a net gain of over ₹734 crore for the group. Over the entire investigation period, the options segment alone yielded the firm a staggering ₹43,289 crore in profits, starkly contrasting with their cumulative losses of ₹7,687 crore in other segments. This imbalance was a critical indicator of manipulation, suggesting that losses in one segment were a calculated cost to secure far larger gains in another.
2. The “Extended Marking the Close Strategy”: Gaming the Finish Line
The second strategy focused on manipulating prices during the critical final hours of trading, particularly on expiry days when options contracts settle based on closing prices. Jane Street allegedly engaged in highly concentrated selling or buying of index components and futures in the last two hours of trading to influence the closing index level precisely to their advantage, thereby affecting options pricing and ensuring profitable settlements for their gargantuan positions. This tactic exploited the heightened volatility and volume typically seen near market close on expiry days.
The Scale of Alleged Deception and Its Victims
SEBI’s investigation, reportedly triggered by a US legal dispute where the accused firm accused former traders of stealing its India-based options strategy, meticulously tracked its trading patterns. The regulator’s order underscores the “intensity and sheer scale of their intervention,” concluding that the entity created a “false or misleading appearance of market activity.”
The victims of these alleged manipulative practices are overwhelmingly retail investors. India’s derivatives market, especially index options, has seen explosive growth in retail participation. These individuals, often trading with limited capital and relying on real-time price movements, are particularly vulnerable. SEBI’s own research indicates that a staggering 93% of retail F&O traders incurred losses between FY22-FY24, and the regulator opines that the entity’s massive profits may account for a significant portion of these widespread retail losses.
Disregard for Warnings: A Fatal Misstep for the Firm
Perhaps most damning for the accused entity is SEBI’s revelation that it allegedly ignored explicit warnings. In February 2025, following SEBI’s directives, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) issued a caution letter to its Singapore Pte Ltd and JSI Investments Pvt Ltd units. The advisory urged them to refrain from taking excessively large cash-equivalent positions and to cease trading patterns indicative of manipulation. While the firm reportedly acknowledged the warning and offered assurances of compliance to the NSE, SEBI’s subsequent investigation found that it continued to engage in similar manipulative activities, including the “extended marking the close” pattern, as recently as May 2025.
SEBI’s Assertive Stance: Unprecedented Measures
SEBI’s interim order imposes severe and wide-ranging restrictions on the firm in question:
Complete Market Ban: All its entities, including JSI Investments Private Ltd, JSI2 Investments Pvt Ltd, its Singapore Pte Ltd arm, and its Asia Trading unit, are immediately barred from accessing the Indian securities market. They are prohibited from buying, selling, or dealing in any securities, directly or indirectly. Record Disgorgement: The firm has been ordered to deposit ₹4,843.57 crore (approximately $566.71 million) as “unlawful gains” into an escrow account. This marks the highest-ever disgorgement amount ordered by SEBI for any illegal market activity, underscoring the magnitude of the alleged manipulation.
Asset Freeze: All bank accounts, demat accounts, and custodial accounts linked to its entities in India are frozen. While credits are permitted, no debits are allowed without SEBI’s explicit permission. Ongoing Investigation: The ban is an interim measure, and SEBI’s investigation is far from over. The regulator has indicated it may broaden its probe to include other expiry days, other indices (including across exchanges), and other potential manipulative patterns, signalling a deeper clean-up in the market.
This powerful move by SEBI sends an unambiguous message to all global high-frequency and algorithmic trading firms operating in India: market integrity and investor protection are paramount. While the accused firm has publicly denied the allegations, reiterating its commitment to compliance and indicating its intent to dispute the findings and appeal the decision, the regulator’s firm stance reflects a growing global vigilance against market abuses by technologically advanced trading entities.
This case also serves as a critical learning point for retail investors, highlighting the inherent risks in complex derivatives trading and the need for heightened awareness of market dynamics that may be influenced by large players. While industry experts like Zerodha co-founder Nithin Kamath acknowledge the potential short-term impact on market liquidity if proprietary trading firms (who account for nearly 50% of options volumes) withdraw, the long-term benefit of reinforced market integrity is undeniable. SEBI’s action in this matter is a pivotal moment, shaping the regulatory landscape for sophisticated trading activities in India and reinforcing the principle that fair play must always precede profit.
For more updates visit: The Morning Draft
Stock Market Movers: Why These 5 Stocks Are Surging in July 2025. Shocking Results!!